Dalhousie University college of Nursing, Forrest Building, 6299 southern St, Halifax, Canada

Search for an ext papers by this author

Doctoral Student

Dalhousie University institution of Nursing, Forrest Building, 6299 southern St, Halifax, Canada

Search for more papers through this author
Please testimonial our Terms and Conditions the Use and check box below to re-publishing full-text variation of article.

You are watching: Phenomenology of illness and disease

Shareable Link

Use the link below to share a full-text version of this short article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.


Carel"s goal in Phenomenology of condition is twofold: to use phenomenology to much better understand illness and to highlight the value of illness to philosophy. The result is a book that is relevant to two really different readers: the clinician or wellness researcher, and also the philosopher. I approach this review as a registered nurse and also doctoral student, and, thus, my reading of the publication is seen through a clinician researcher lens. Those acquainted with the background of phenomenology are likely to argue that a phenomenological therapy of condition is no novel, which Carel it s her highlights when distinguishing her job-related from the of Merleau-Ponty, Sartre, Toombs, Svenaeus, and others.1(p36) She suggests that these works have actually primarily concentrated on specific features the illness, as opposed to disease generally, conversely, she seeks to build a considerable phenomenology of illness.1(p36) Carel says that critical part that this general frame is the capability to account because that seemingly paradoxical phenomena such together traumatic expansion wherein individuals report higher happiness after a brush with significant illness.1(p38) together a general frame is a worthy and beneficial goal come both audiences of the text, and, in this effort, Carel largely succeeds.


Carel"s writing is a wonderful example of the power of the phenomenological approach. Phenomenology of illness leaves the reader feeling a depths appreciation because that the experience of serious illness generally, and also breathlessness specifically. Her use of quotes and also stories is an effective and helps to highlight the effect of disease on lived time, space, body, and relation. An example of one together quote the highlights how disease affects our imagine future originates from Arthur Frank"s2(p27) description of his cancer diagnosis:

What was it prefer to be told I had cancer? The future disappeared. Loved ones came to be faces ns would never ever see again. I felt ns was walking through a nightmare that was unreal by utterly real. <…> My body has end up being a type of quicksand, and also I was sinking right into myself, right into my disease.

The text is well-off with instances like this, both indigenous Carel"s very own experience and also other released works. This approach is crucial in the book"s ability transform the abstract to the concrete.

Carel restricts her initiatives to “serious, chronic, and life-changing ill health, as opposed to a cold or bout of tonsillitis.”1(p6) The first chapter that the publication summarizes the contributions to phenomenology the Husserl, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, and Sartre that are provided through the book. This is a welcome piece of analysis for those coming from a clinical background due to the fact that it introduces concepts with admirable clarity. Carel develops her general frame in Chapters 2 to Four and also then uses it come the phenomenon the breathlessness in thing Five. The framework consists of a synthetic of Toomb"s five losses the illness3; the target body and also the body as live as presented by Husserl and developed through Merleau-Ponty4; Sartre"s summary of the objective, subjective, and intersubjective level of the body5; and the ide of the healthy body as transparent. This structure provides a convincing and seemingly finish account that illness" profound impacts on our methods of gift in the world and also provides vital insights into the relational facets of illness.

Chapters Six, Eight, and Nine are applications of just how this structure can help to know and resolve such issues as the ideas of “ill however well,” the unintended marginalization that the expertise of patients (epistemic injustice), and also illness together an invitation to philosophy (for both patient themselves, as well as philosophers through case study). These 3 chapters have significant implications and also may serve as the groundwork for exciting developments outside the philosophy. Because that example, a challenging problem in the field of health business economics has been the the basic public generally underestimates the quality of life proficient by those v severe illness or disability. Generally, nationwide guideline body state that the public perception of quality of life in a offered health state have to be provided in financial analyses (Canadian firm for Drugs and Technologies in health , 2006). One argument that has been supplied to justify the usage of public perceptions matches those living in a specific health state is that the observed distinction is just the result of adaptation.6 Carel"s creating on the concept of “ill yet well” offers the philosophical structure for an argument that a brush with serious condition may aid draw attention to the fact of one"s mortality and lead to renovations in top quality of life that are independent of mere adaptation. The principle of epistemic injustice will certainly resonate with any type of clinician, and also Carel"s suggested solution (the patience toolkit) is a worthy very first effort to help resolve this issue—I will discuss this in further detail below.

As a clinician, I uncovered Chapter seven “illness as being-towards-death” the end of place and also not essential to the all at once thesis of the book. By the time a reader has actually arrived at this point, the prestige of our connection with fatality in shaping meaning, and the role that condition can pat in illustration attention come our mortality, has currently been convincingly presented. The very first half of the chapter gives background ~ above the importance of death that makes much more sense to it is in featured in the previously parts in the publication (and come some extent is, for example, in the bodily doubt chapter). The second half attempts come restructure Heidegger"s definition of death in order to permit it to be de-individuated and permit a relational being towards death.1(p178) The an outcome is one abrupt transition in the method of the book from one the is available to all audiences, to one the is dense and challenging to understand for those who carry out not have actually the requisite familiarity through Being and Time7 and its criticisms. Countless clinicians will certainly be left wonder why it was important and also why it shows up so so late in the book. This chapter can perhaps be supported by future work that will help make clear why death needs to it is in de-individuated because that Carel"s structure to it is in complete. Until then, this thing will most likely be of many interest to scholastic philosopher vice versa, the most vital content because that clinicians is extended in a much more accessible way in earlier chapters. When this chapter provides extr depth and understanding, mastery the the content at the level the is gift is not likely important in order to use Carel"s structure to clinical exercise or theory propelled research.


As mentioned previously, Carel"s framework and also her conversation of that is potential clinical utility is just one of the most interesting possibilities stemming from this book. In chapter One, Carel states that phenomenology provides the way through which disease can be offered to “explore an individual life, the meanings, goals, and values and also how best to change them in solution to illness.”1(p15) A footnote clues to the promise of a “patient toolkit” that “aims at enabling this process.”1(p15) The toolkit itself falls somewhat flat, and, in this section, I explain how this framework and a true “toolkit” strategy could bring about a paradigm transition in clinical care.

The patience toolkit is presented as one feasible solution come the concerns of epistemic injustice debated in chapter Eight. Epistemic righteousness as identified by Fricker takes two forms: testimonial injustice in which the experiences and opinions that those in a disadvantaged place are ignored and discounted, and hermeneutical unjust which is when the lack of “collective hermeneutical resource”8(p7) provides it impossible for a human to define their experience in a way that deserve to be construed by others. Carel"s toolkit take away the form of a workshop centred approximately a 3 step procedure she describes as bracketing the natural attitude, thematizing illness, and also reviewing the ok person"s gift in the world.1(p201) Interestingly, Carel offers small discussion about the obvious conflict in between her hermeneutic phenomenological approach and her usage of bracketing in the toolkit. She intends the process to emphasis attention in the endure of condition rather than the objective reality of the disease, encourage consideration of the myriad methods through with the disease is experienced (eg, cognitive and also emotional), and also gain new understanding of how the condition experience has adjusted the individual"s way of gift in the world.1(p201) that was initially intended as a patient resource but is additionally used with clinicians or blended groups. The workshop as described seems unquestionably valuable in help clinicians to revisit the method they approach care and is comparable to various other arts-based programs intended to boost empathy and also encourage a holistic strategy to care.9 regardless of this, ns do have actually some reservations as to whether the toolkit as defined will have the ability to realize the potential.

The primary problem with the toolkit is the it is not really a toolkit at all, however an thorough full job workshop. There is no doubt the this format permits for a depth of reflection that would be difficult or difficult to accomplish otherwise, but it severely borders the capability of the treatment to reach big numbers of patients or clinicians. Possibly a workshop have the right to be the primary kind of the intervention, yet a toolkit argues something I, together a clinician, have the right to turn to in the minute to assist support my assessment or chip far at some underlying epistemic injustice. I am reminded the the way in which the experience of postpartum parents in the NICU is frequently shaped by their an answer to standardized depression symptom inventories or screening scales. The is concerning to imagine come what degree we may be failing to aid our patient by assuring castle that concerning feelings space “normal” or by being unable to know the endure they room describing. That is not unusual to have a feeling that other is being missed, and also one wonders if a phenomenological toolkit that could be quickly at your disposal could be offered in this moments to support assessment, diagnosis, and also treatment.

The advantage of a suitable “toolkit” approach to Carel"s idea is that it additionally carries through it the opportunity of being an element of an entire phenomenological method to care. Nursing has spent considerable effort in occurring theories that caring the are totally free to Carel"s framework and could aid to operationalize method to care.10 In this reimagination the the toolkit, it could end up being a main aspect of the method in which a nurse would approach care, comparable to exactly how Jean Watson"s Caritas processes have been transcribed top top cards and also paired with quotes and also images to encourage in-the-moment reflection and conversation. If admittedly less detailed than a complete day workshop, this method would seem come offer much more promise in supporting a sustained phenomenological method to treatment which might benefit more patients over a longer duration of time.

See more: Reviews & Ratings For Nikon P-223 4-12X40 Review, Nikon'S Dedicated Ar


Despite part limitations, Carel"s Phenomenology of illness shows up to have actually succeeded in emerging a framework of a phenomenology of condition that goes past descriptions of specific characteristics of, for example, mental disorders.11 The general, holistic strategy results in a framework that feels pertinent to clinicians in vast settings. Her creating is engaging and also evocative, and she succeeds in laying the groundwork for an approach to ideology that has actually implications that range from the everyday interactions between clinicians and also patients, come the underlying arguments for how we understand the impact of condition on happiness and also quality that life.